From: Ivan (ivan@iip.net)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2006 - 08:49:08 ART
Auto-RP group use dense mode. IMO in sparse mode it behaviour will incorrect.
> Why don't use ip pim sparse-mode and ip pim auto-rp listener ?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Orhan Osmanov
>
> Senior System Engineer
>
> Mobile: +359 888 585630
>
> E-mail: orhan.osmanov@siemens.com
>
> SIEMENS EOOD
>
> Bulgaria, Sofia 1309, 2 "Kukush"str.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ivan
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Stavros Filargyropoulos
> Subject: Re: Multicast
>
> Once task restrict using dense mode, you can't using ip pim
> sparce-dense-mode.
> Instead AutoRP need use BSR. As for RP spoofing, think that ip pim
> bsr-border
> must be used at border routers.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > if a task tells you to configure so that RP spoofing should not
>
> happen; and
>
> > one restriction tells that ip pim dense is not allowed but they are
> > multicast groups that the RP does not covers, could I use ip pim
> > sparse-dense-mode and ip pim rp-announce-filter announcements at the
> > mapping agent?
> >
> > tia
> > *Stav.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART