From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sun Jul 16 2006 - 17:48:02 ART
Hello, please sorry to put my nose here, but there is no conform action in
the 3550 Policer.
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police ?
<8000-1000000000> Bits per second
aggregate Choose aggregate policer for current class
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police 8000 ?
<8000-2000000> Normal burst bytes
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police 8000 8000 ?
exceed-action action when rate is exceeded
<cr>
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police 8000 8000 ex
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police 8000 8000 exceed-action ?
drop drop packet
policed-dscp-transmit change dscp per policed-dscp map and send it
Rack6Sw1(config-pmap-c)#police 8000 8000 exceed-action
policed-dscp-transmit?
<cr>
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Ivan
Enviado el: Domingo, 16 de Julio de 2006 03:45 p.m.
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Jeff Ryan
Asunto: Re: CLASS MAP on 3550
on 3550 packet can be marked only with policing or explicitly marked trough
cos. Ip precedense it is part of dscp, therefore you can set dscp.
--------
class-map match-all xxx
match access-group 1
police-map xxx
match xxx
police 64000 conform-action set-ipprec 5 exceed-action set-ipprec 5
--------
int f0/8
mls qos cos 1
mls qos cos override
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 40 16 24 32 40 48 56
^^
> All, I was wondering what your thoughts are to a lab scenerio I am doing
> now as shown below:
>
>
> SW1 FA0/8 is assigned to VLAN 12 which has some critical servers on it.
> Mark all packets on VLAN 12 with IP Precedence of Critical.
> --------
> Rack1SW1#
> mls qos
> !
> ip cef
> !
> class-map match-all VLAN_12
> match access-group 1
> !
> policy-map IP_PREC
> class VLAN_12
> set ip precedence 5
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/8
> switchport mode access
> service-policy input IP_PREC
>
>
> OR, is this class-map method more preferred...
>
>
> class-map match-all VLAN_12
> match access-group 1
> match vlan12
> !
> policy-map IP_PREC
> class VLAN_12
> set ip precedence 5
> !
> access-list 1 permit any
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/8
> switchport mode access
> service-policy input IP_PREC
> !
>
> To me, the first method is shorter and seems to meet the requirements
since
> it matches "all packets" on th eswitch interface that is in Vlan 12. Your
> thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:47 ART