Re: Redistribution

From: Petr Lapukhov (petr@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2006 - 13:11:05 ART

• Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Shaping Average / Peak vs. Policing"
• Previous message: Aaron Pilcher: "RE: OSPF AS process ID"
• Maybe in reply to: mattclark@hispeed.ch: "Redistribution"
• Next in thread: Godswill Oletu: "Re: Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes, this works fine.

Just make sure you dont have any OSPF "native" prefixes as
OSPF "external" . (i.e. if you did "redistribute connected
subnets"). You can filter out useful information this way ;)

2006/7/5, mattclark@hispeed.ch <mattclark@hispeed.ch>:
>
> Hi All
>
> A quick question regarding using the internal command in OSPF for
> redistribution.
> If OSPF was the core routing protocol and you had to mutually redistribute
> into say RIP could you redistribute and match type internal to ensure any
> external prefixes are not fed back to the native protocol?
> Or is it a good idea to tag as well?
>
> Thanks
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
Petr Lapukhov, CCIE #16379
petr@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

• Next message: Schulz, Dave: "RE: Shaping Average / Peak vs. Policing"
• Previous message: Aaron Pilcher: "RE: OSPF AS process ID"
• Maybe in reply to: mattclark@hispeed.ch: "Redistribution"
• Next in thread: Godswill Oletu: "Re: Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART