From: Daniel Fredrick (dfredrick@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jul 02 2006 - 11:39:37 ART
I think in the real world... you would have a cisco device on one end, which
you should enable the ietf encap on the map statement. On the other end you
may have a BayNetwork Router... so by default it it'll send ietf. So you
won't have to configure it on the remote end from the cisco router.
But I think in the lab environment... all you have is cisco equipement. So I
would think you would have to put it on both ends of the connection... local
and remote... or in your case... R3 and R2.
HTH
Dan
On 7/1/06, Sami <sy1977@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Group,
>
> R1,R2 and R3 hub and spoke , R3 is hub. R2 uses ietf encapsulation on FR
> interface..
>
> If it is IETF enacpsulation on R2 then on hub R3 do I have use following
> command or no need of mentioning ietf
>
> R3
> ---
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.1 301 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.2 302 ietf broadcast
>
> R2
> ----
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.3 203 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.1 203
>
> R1
> ---
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.3 103 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 123.123.123.2 103
>
> Thanks
> Sami
>
> Thanks
> Sami
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:46 ART