port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)

From: Koen Zeilstra (koen@koenzeilstra.com)
Date: Wed Jun 21 2006 - 11:12:00 ART

Next message: Daniel Fredrick: "Re: eBGP Neighbors"
Previous message: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com: "Re: eBGP Neighbors"
Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Koen Zeilstra: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Ivan: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group,

What would be lab best practise to configure prefer traffic flowing on one
of the two trunks.

Configure port priority on both switches? Only on the root bridge or only
on the non-root bridge.

I would love to hear your opinion on this.

thanks,

Koen

-----------------------
"See - the thing is - I'm an absolutist. I mean, kind of ... in a way ..."

Next message: Daniel Fredrick: "Re: eBGP Neighbors"
Previous message: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com: "Re: eBGP Neighbors"
Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Koen Zeilstra: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Maybe reply: Ivan: "Re: port priority for spanning-tree on which switch (both?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART