From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2006 - 00:48:27 ART
Yeah man I'm so dummy...
I forgot to put Rack1R5(config)#ip pim autorp listener
Sorry for bothering
Thanks
Victor.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
Enviado el: Lunes, 19 de Junio de 2006 11:43 p.m.
Para: Victor Cappuccio; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: Mulitcast ..... the never ending story
Victor,
What PIM mode are you running? Post the output from the "show
ip mroute", "show ip pim neighbor", and "show ip route" on all routers
participating in multicast.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Victor Cappuccio
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 9:56 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Mulitcast ..... the never ending story
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> Well I have this dilemma of the use of Tunnels in Multicast (seems
that
> the
> tunnel interfaces are the Ave maria or the strange problems, and I do
not
> like that)
>
>
>
> R5 -S0/0==== FR ===== S0/0- R3 -e0/0 ====== -f0/3 Sw1
>
>
>
> The question state that R3 should be RP for groups X Y Z and R5
should be
> the RP for M, U ,Q (simple standard access-list and ip pim send-rp-
> announce
> in R5 and R3)
>
>
>
> But I get this output from the deb ip mp
>
>
>
> IP(0): s=150.1.3.3 (Serial0/0) d=224.0.1.40 (Ethernet0/0) id=7736,
> prot=17,
> len=54(54), mforward
>
> IP(0): s=150.1.3.3 (Serial0/0) d=224.0.1.39 id=7739, prot=17,
len=58(54),
> mroute olist null
>
>
>
> From my understanding:
>
>
>
> The traffic sent to the Mapping Agent for the RP registration fails to
> arrive because it is the same interface we use to receive the RP
> Information
> from R3 Correct?
>
>
>
> So I need to create a Tunnel for this particular case? Is there any
other
> option? (off course BSR could help but the Task asks for Auto-RP)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Victor.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART