From: Roberto Fernandez (rofernandez@us.telefonica.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 16:49:20 ART
Friends,
On my second attempt (failed) I faced one typo, it took me some time
(not an hour) to go to the proctor and confirm. It was not spelling or
grammar; it was like an addition of a number on a command output where
it couldn't possible be. But being the CCIE Lab, you always trust more
on the test than in yourself...this time I was right, but it cost me
some time. (Anyway those 15 or 30 minutes wouldn't have make any
difference)
Best Regards,
Roberto
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Godswill Oletu
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:32 PM
To: dfredrick@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Still waiting on Results from Friday
Rick,
I can feel you men, hang in there.
Lets be serious, without breaking the NDA, can you share more light on
the
kind of typos? It is forgiving if the typos are spelling errors, or some
grammer related terms that will not affect one's understanding or
solution.
However, if the typos will influence how someone intepretes or approach
a
particular task, then it will be highly unfair and Cisco should have
caught
it before releasing the lab to their centre.
Thanks.
Godswill Oletu
----- Original Message -----
From: <dfredrick@gmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: Still waiting on Results from Friday
> Man... it's 2pm... and still no results... What the longest someone
has
> had to wait for the results. You think's because I had two typos? And
> since it took me an hour to convince the proctor that they were
typos...
> it's taking them a bit to figure out their mistakes?
>
> Do you think that this should be grounds for a refund... (the typos)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART