RE: Priority Queue

From: Kulcsár
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 14:41:01 ART

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF discontigous areas"
• Previous message: Kobus Van Rooyen: "OSPF discontigous areas"
• Maybe in reply to: Sami: "Priority Queue"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Priority Queue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Sami,

What do you think of "match protocol rtp"? I tried this, but the solution was different.

Andras

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Sami
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:18 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Priority Queue

Group,

task says 200K VOIP traffic should be dequeued first.

there could be two solution Just wanted to know what is difference between these two , can I use the first one..

- create a class and match ip rtp 16384 < range 16383>
- create a access list and match udp port 16384 till 32767 and map to class

Thanks

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: OSPF discontigous areas"
• Previous message: Kobus Van Rooyen: "OSPF discontigous areas"
• Maybe in reply to: Sami: "Priority Queue"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Priority Queue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART