From: Elias Chari (elias.chari@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 09:34:34 ART
Say all interfaces in the router are in use. You can create a tracking
object to track the reachability of an ip route which does not exist in the
routing table.
track 2 ip route 50.50.50.50 255.255.255.0 reachability
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.10.1.6 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
standby 1 ip 192.10.1.10
standby 1 timers 1 2
standby 1 track 2 decrement 50
Rack1R6#sh stand
FastEthernet0/0 - Group 1
State is Standby
4 state changes, last state change 00:00:16
Virtual IP address is 192.10.1.10
Active virtual MAC address is 0000.0c07.ac01
Local virtual MAC address is 0000.0c07.ac01 (default)
Hello time 1 sec, hold time 2 sec
Next hello sent in 0.492 secs
Preemption disabled
Active router is 192.10.1.200, priority 80 (expires in 1.228 sec)
Standby router is local
Priority 50 (default 100)
Track object 2 state Down decrement 50
IP redundancy name is "hsrp-Fa0/0-1" (default)
Rack1R6#sh track 2
Track 2
IP route 50.50.50.50 255.255.255.0 reachability
Reachability is Down (no route)
1 change, last change 00:03:32
First-hop interface is unknown
Tracked by:
HSRP FastEthernet0/0 1
Rgds
Elias
On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Valid one Curt . But the lab did not want me to create another interface
> unless stated nor an interface was down .
> The solution is valid though .
>
> Thanks, Kay
>
>
>
>
> On 6/19/06, Plank, Jason <JPlank@concordefs.com> wrote:
> >
> > I totally agree. I don't know if you would see this in the real lab or
> not
> > but I imagine they would tell you not to manipulate IP addresses. This
> > particular scenario I guess it's probably the easiest way to do it.. not
> > sure what vendors lab they are using though.
> >
> > -------------------
> > J. Marshall Plank
> > Network Engineer
> > 101 Bellevue Parkway
> > Wilmington, DE 19809
> > E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com
> > Phone: 302-793-5913
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Curt
> > Girardin
> > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:20 AM
> > To: Kay D; Shanky
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: RE: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Lets say R1 needs to have a higher HSRP PROIORITY than R2 without using
> > STANDBY PREEMPT or STANDBY PRIORITY commands. I assume they are talking
> > about the HSRP PRIORITY values, and not just who will win the election.
> >
> > Why not leave R1 at it's default priority, then go over to R2 and use
> > the standby track command and point it to an interface that happens to
> > be down. Thus effectively lowering the PRIORITY on R2. Then R1 will
> > have a higher priority than R2 without using the PREEMPT or PRIORITY
> > commands.
> >
> > If there are no "down" interfaces on R2, then just create a tunnel
> > interface on R2 with an inaccessable destination, or no destination.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Curt Girardin, #15972
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Kay D
> > Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:55 AM
> > To: Shanky
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
> >
> > Hi SHanky,
> > The task is to make R1 active without using
> > Priority and preempt hence highest ip address could be used .Thanks ,Kay
> > .
> >
> > On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Glad it worked, so the task must have a wording like R1 should be the
> > > active router and not what you mentioned that R1's priority should be
> > > higher without using ..any commands on any routers.
> > >
> > > Is it? Coz the HSRP election would be won by 1. Priority 2. IP address
> >
> > > of the I/F.
> > >
> > > So, if you want R1 to be Active for HSRP, either it should have higher
> >
> > > priority or higher IP address.
> > >
> > > Do let me know if the Task clearly says to increase the priority
> > > without using the preemt or priority commands ? or does it say only to
> >
> > > ensure R1 is the active router ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Shanky
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/19/06, jhtemail <jhtemail@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest HRSP must have a backup condition in case of a tie
> > > > in priority. Maybe something like manipulating the IP Address of the
> >
> > > > interface, something like the higher IP Address wins. Someone else
> > > > may have a better idea but check your other options there may be a
> > > > way to tip the balance.
> > > > Could also try playing with the MAC Address setting. Setup HRSP see
> > > > which one becomes Active, then see what you need to manipulate to
> > > > switch it to the other. For testing reasons use the pre-empt command
> >
> > > > and when you have cracked it take out the pre-empt command and set
> > > > the system up as requested in the question.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> >
> > > > Of Kay D
> > > > Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 7:00 PM
> > > > To: Shanky
> > > > Cc: Cisco certification
> > > > Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
> > > >
> > > > Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on
> > > > neither routers .
> > > > Any other way out ????
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher
> > > > > priority....without
> > > > using
> > > > > the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other router
> > > > > on
> > > > the
> > > > > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's priority
> > > > higher
> > > > > without using the command on R1.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope it helps
> > > > >
> > > > > Shanky
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without
> > > > > using
> > > >
> > > > > standy priority or preempt .
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks ,
> > > > > Kay D
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > ___
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Send instant messages to your online friends
> > > > http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > The information in this message may be proprietary and/or
> > confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> > message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> > responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
> > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please notify First Data
> > immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
> > computer.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART