From: Curt Girardin (curt.girardin@chicos.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 09:25:02 ART
ok,
How about creating a tracked object using TRACK and IP SLA commands, or
just creating a TRACK object to watch for a non-existant route.
For Example:
ip sla monitor 1
type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 239.2.2.2
ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now
!
track 1 rtr 1
!
track 2 ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 reachability
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 5.5.5.5 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
standby 5 ip 5.5.5.1
standby 5 track 1
standby 6 ip 6.6.6.1 secondary
standby 6 track 2
R1#show standby
FastEthernet0/0 - Group 5
State is Active
2 state changes, last state change 00:03:28
Virtual IP address is 5.5.5.1
Active virtual MAC address is 0000.0c07.ac05
Local virtual MAC address is 0000.0c07.ac05 (v1 default)
Hello time 3 sec, hold time 10 sec
Next hello sent in 1.916 secs
Preemption disabled
Active router is local
Standby router is unknown
Priority 90 (default 100)
Track object 1 state Down decrement 10
IP redundancy name is "hsrp-Fa0/0-5" (default)
FastEthernet0/0 - Group 6
State is Learn
Virtual IP address is unknown
Secondary virtual IP address 6.6.6.1
Active virtual MAC address is unknown
Local virtual MAC address is 0000.0c07.ac06 (v1 default)
Hello time 3 sec, hold time 10 sec
Preemption disabled
Active router is unknown
Standby router is unknown
Priority 90 (default 100)
Track object 2 state Down decrement 10
IP redundancy name is "hsrp-Fa0/0-6" (default)
From univercd:
Cisco IOS Release 12.2(15)T and Later Releases
standby [group-number] track object-number [decrement
priority-decrement]
Thanks,
Curt
________________________________
From: Kay D [mailto:krsna83@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 8:10 AM
To: Plank, Jason
Cc: Curt Girardin; Shanky; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
Valid one Curt . But the lab did not want me to create another interface
unless stated nor an interface was down .
The solution is valid though .
Thanks, Kay
On 6/19/06, Plank, Jason <JPlank@concordefs.com> wrote:
I totally agree. I don't know if you would see this in the real
lab or not
but I imagine they would tell you not to manipulate IP
addresses. This
particular scenario I guess it's probably the easiest way to do
it.. not
sure what vendors lab they are using though.
-------------------
J. Marshall Plank
Network Engineer
101 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com
Phone: 302-793-5913
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com
<mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> ] On Behalf Of Curt
Girardin
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:20 AM
To: Kay D; Shanky
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
Hi,
Lets say R1 needs to have a higher HSRP PROIORITY than R2
without using
STANDBY PREEMPT or STANDBY PRIORITY commands. I assume they are
talking
about the HSRP PRIORITY values, and not just who will win the
election.
Why not leave R1 at it's default priority, then go over to R2
and use
the standby track command and point it to an interface that
happens to
be down. Thus effectively lowering the PRIORITY on R2. Then R1
will
have a higher priority than R2 without using the PREEMPT or
PRIORITY
commands.
If there are no "down" interfaces on R2, then just create a
tunnel
interface on R2 with an inaccessable destination, or no
destination.
HTH,
Curt Girardin, #15972
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On
Behalf Of
Kay D
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 5:55 AM
To: Shanky
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
Hi SHanky,
The task is to make R1 active without using
Priority and preempt hence highest ip address could be used
.Thanks ,Kay
.
On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Glad it worked, so the task must have a wording like R1 should
be the
> active router and not what you mentioned that R1's priority
should be
> higher without using ..any commands on any routers.
>
> Is it? Coz the HSRP election would be won by 1. Priority 2. IP
address
> of the I/F.
>
> So, if you want R1 to be Active for HSRP, either it should
have higher
> priority or higher IP address.
>
> Do let me know if the Task clearly says to increase the
priority
> without using the preemt or priority commands ? or does it say
only to
> ensure R1 is the active router ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Shanky
>
>
> On 6/19/06, jhtemail < jhtemail@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest HRSP must have a backup condition in case of
a tie
> > in priority. Maybe something like manipulating the IP
Address of the
> > interface, something like the higher IP Address wins.
Someone else
> > may have a better idea but check your other options there
may be a
> > way to tip the balance.
> > Could also try playing with the MAC Address setting. Setup
HRSP see
> > which one becomes Active, then see what you need to
manipulate to
> > switch it to the other. For testing reasons use the pre-empt
command
> > and when you have cracked it take out the pre-empt command
and set
> > the system up as requested in the question.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com]
On Behalf
> > Of Kay D
> > Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 7:00 PM
> > To: Shanky
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
> >
> > Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor
preempt on
> > neither routers .
> > Any other way out ????
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/06, Shanky < shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher
> > > priority....without
> > using
> > > the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other
router
> > > on
> > the
> > > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's
priority
> > higher
> > > without using the command on R1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope it helps
> > >
> > > Shanky
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router
without
> > > using
> >
> > > standy priority or preempt .
> > >
> > > Thanks ,
> > > Kay D
> > >
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART