From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Thu Jun 15 2006 - 14:33:48 ART
You should not have to add the prefix lists to this, since this will
summarize any routes outbound that you sending. The key on this is, to
make sure that your mask is scaled down and specific enough to where you
are not advertising routes (through the summary) that are not included
in your network. HTH
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
forwardtruth@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ip summary-address rip with distribute-list
Lab 7 V3 Task 4.4 RIP
Part of the requirments are:
1- The only route that should be advertised to BB2 through RIP is a
summary of your internal address space 163.x.0.0.
2- This summary should encompass your entire network and still be as
specific as possible without unnecessarily overlapping address spcae.
Isn't the line of configuration below enough to satisfy the requirments
(1 and 2)above ?
ip summary-address rip 163.1.0.0 255.255.192.0
ip summary-address rip 150.1.0.0 255.255.240.0
Why do I need to add as well, these lines below (Is it mandotary or
optional)? :
distribute-list prefix RIP_SUMMARY out Ethernet0/0
!
ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 5 permit 163.1.0.0/18
ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 10 permit 150.1.0.0/20
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART