Re: ip summary-address rip with distribute-list

From: Godswill Oletu (oletu@inbox.lv)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2006 - 05:20:07 ART


I think it make sense to include the 'distribute-list' and 'prefix-list', so
that you are sure that it is only the summary routes that will be advertised
to BB2.

Look at the aspect of the task that said 'The ONLY route that should be
advertised to BB2..." You might not be too sure you have fulfill that aspect
of the task without including the 'distribute-list' allowing only your
summary routes. This will ensure that, other redistributed external/new
networks routes into RIP will not get advertised to BB2, which would have
been the case without the 'distribute-list'

HTH
Godswill Oletu

----- Original Message -----
From: <forwardtruth@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:01 PM
Subject: ip summary-address rip with distribute-list

> Lab 7 V3 Task 4.4 RIP
>
> Part of the requirments are:
>
> 1- The only route that should be advertised to BB2 through RIP is a
summary of your internal address space 163.x.0.0.
>
> 2- This summary should encompass your entire network and still be as
specific as possible without unnecessarily overlapping address spcae.
>
>
> Isn't the line of configuration below enough to satisfy the requirments (1
and 2)above ?
> ip summary-address rip 163.1.0.0 255.255.192.0
> ip summary-address rip 150.1.0.0 255.255.240.0
>
>
> Why do I need to add as well, these lines below (Is it mandotary or
optional)? :
> distribute-list prefix RIP_SUMMARY out Ethernet0/0
> !
> ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 5 permit 163.1.0.0/18
> ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 10 permit 150.1.0.0/20
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART