Multicast trouble shooting

From: Feras Abunamous \(fabunamo\) (fabunamo@cisco.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 19:57:29 ART

• Next message: Bajo: "Re: FREEK end to end keep alive parameters"
• Previous message: Bajo: "Re: 3550 "system mtu" versus VLAN mtu"
• Next in thread: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Feras Abunamous \(fabunamo\): "RE: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Feras Abunamous \(fabunamo\): "RE: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Jian Gu: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

All,

        I hade the following scenario
R1------ETH------R5-----Tun----R3-----ETH----R4

I used bsr on R5 and igmp group join on R1. I can ping the group from
the R3 through the tunnel but when I do sh ip pim rp on R3 it does not
sh anything? I tried to ping from R4 and the ping always fail. I was
wondering how come R3 can ping the group and does not sh the RP? And why
the ping from R4 always fail? Any help will be appreciated.

• Next message: Bajo: "Re: FREEK end to end keep alive parameters"
• Previous message: Bajo: "Re: 3550 "system mtu" versus VLAN mtu"
• Next in thread: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Feras Abunamous \(fabunamo\): "RE: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Feras Abunamous \(fabunamo\): "RE: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Jian Gu: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lewis: "Re: Multicast trouble shooting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART