From: Leigh Harrison (ccileigh@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 10:57:10 ART
Hi there Feras,
Both would do the same thing - there is always more than one way to do
things.
Although, I'm not too sure which queues would be used with a nested
policy and multicast rate-limit....
LH
Feras Abunamous (fabunamo) wrote:
> Sorry, I meant the ip multicast rate limit?
>
> Feras Abunamous
> Systems Engineer
> Data-Center Central Area
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Office: 773-695-8008
> Pager: 630-336-7243
> cell: 630-336-7243
> Cisco Systems, CEC Home
>
> fabunamo@cisco.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo)
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:27 PM
> To: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
>
> How is that different than using the ip multicast boundary?
>
> Feras Abunamous
> Systems Engineer
> Data-Center Central Area
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Office: 773-695-8008
> Pager: 630-336-7243
> cell: 630-336-7243
> Cisco Systems, CEC Home
>
> fabunamo@cisco.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:26 PM
> To: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
>
> Match multicast add range
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo)
> Sent: Thu Jun 08 17:21:26 2006
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
>
> Can you someone tell me how do we use class map to limit the multicast?
> Is there a port that we should match?
>
> Feras Abunamous
> Systems Engineer
> Data-Center Central Area
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Office: 773-695-8008
> Pager: 630-336-7243
> cell: 630-336-7243
> Cisco Systems, CEC Home
>
> fabunamo@cisco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ivan
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:05 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Leigh Harrison
> Cc: ELDHO PAUL
> Subject: Re: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
>
> Why not ip multicast rate-limit ?
>
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On the frame config there is the option to apply a class map.
>>
>> You could put a nested policy in there restricting multicast flows to
>> only 64k
>>
>> LH
>>
>> ELDHO PAUL wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Again I've a question on frame-relay.
>>>
>>> *R6's DLCI 622 operates between 384 kbps and 512 kbps. Ensure that
>>>
> R6
>
>>> never sends more than 64 kbps of multicast streams into this DLCI.
>>>
> Do
>
>>> not configure any policy maps or access lists*.
>>>
>>> Is there any special way to treat the multicast traffic otherthan
>>> configuring mincir.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eldho.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART