Re: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.

From: san (san.study@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 14:52:31 ART


*I read the below, Not sure about the question. But the below command can
also be used in certain cases.

frame-relay broadcast-queue* *size byte-rate packet-rate

Since Multicast is a part of broadcast....Is the above command valid. ?

*
On 6/9/06, Leigh Harrison <ccileigh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there Feras,
>
> Both would do the same thing - there is always more than one way to do
> things.
>
> Although, I'm not too sure which queues would be used with a nested
> policy and multicast rate-limit....
>
> LH
>
> Feras Abunamous (fabunamo) wrote:
> > Sorry, I meant the ip multicast rate limit?
> >
> > Feras Abunamous
> > Systems Engineer
> > Data-Center Central Area
> > Cisco Systems, Inc.
> > Office: 773-695-8008
> > Pager: 630-336-7243
> > cell: 630-336-7243
> > Cisco Systems, CEC Home
> >
> > fabunamo@cisco.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo)
> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:27 PM
> > To: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
> >
> > How is that different than using the ip multicast boundary?
> >
> > Feras Abunamous
> > Systems Engineer
> > Data-Center Central Area
> > Cisco Systems, Inc.
> > Office: 773-695-8008
> > Pager: 630-336-7243
> > cell: 630-336-7243
> > Cisco Systems, CEC Home
> >
> > fabunamo@cisco.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:26 PM
> > To: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo); 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
> >
> > Match multicast add range
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Feras Abunamous (fabunamo)
> > Sent: Thu Jun 08 17:21:26 2006
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
> >
> > Can you someone tell me how do we use class map to limit the multicast?
> > Is there a port that we should match?
> >
> > Feras Abunamous
> > Systems Engineer
> > Data-Center Central Area
> > Cisco Systems, Inc.
> > Office: 773-695-8008
> > Pager: 630-336-7243
> > cell: 630-336-7243
> > Cisco Systems, CEC Home
> >
> > fabunamo@cisco.com
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Ivan
> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 8:05 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Leigh Harrison
> > Cc: ELDHO PAUL
> > Subject: Re: Restricting multicast traffic in frame-relay.
> >
> > Why not ip multicast rate-limit ?
> >
> >
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> On the frame config there is the option to apply a class map.
> >>
> >> You could put a nested policy in there restricting multicast flows to
> >> only 64k
> >>
> >> LH
> >>
> >> ELDHO PAUL wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> Again I've a question on frame-relay.
> >>>
> >>> *R6's DLCI 622 operates between 384 kbps and 512 kbps. Ensure that
> >>>
> > R6
> >
> >>> never sends more than 64 kbps of multicast streams into this DLCI.
> >>>
> > Do
> >
> >>> not configure any policy maps or access lists*.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any special way to treat the multicast traffic otherthan
> >>> configuring mincir.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Eldho.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
Thanks & Rgds
SAN


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART