From: Guyler, Rik (rguyler@shp-dayton.org)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 10:07:40 ART
No no...I completely agree.
Nikolay:
When in doubt always go by the stated objective (or ask the proctor but he
might kick for this one). In this case ask yourself - "Self, am I using
VLAN 1? Am I using VLANs 1002-1005?" If the answer is "NO" then don't
allow them. If for some very strange reason you happen to be using them
then of course you probably should allow them over the trunk.
Bottom line: do what the requirement states. Don't make it any harder than
it has to be.
Rik
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Carlos Campos Torres (ccampost)
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 9:37 PM
To: Popgeorgiev Nikolay; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include
I think you shouldn't use them. Why would you want to though?
VTP and STP traffic will get forwarded anyway and token ring and fddi vlans
are not really needed
Please let me know if somebody thinks different on this one
Carlos
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Popgeorgiev Nikolay
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:03 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Special Vlans - should or should NOT include
Dear all,
I have a doubt about when the task requires to allow only the used vlans
over the trunk link(s), should I include also vlan 1 and vlans from 1002
- 1005. Do we really need them.
Thanks
Nick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART