RE: RIP timers

From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jun 04 2006 - 04:54:13 ART


I would get clarification from the proctor, if I
thought that I would change the one value and not the
others.

And I would ensure my neghbors shared the same values
as well.

But you probably already know that part.

Now one sad the default 3x values has to be your own,
but I'd think you read too much into it not to keep
the values similar to the default weighting.

Remember sometimes the simplest solution is the best
solution as long as you solve the problem.

--- Michael Stout <michaelgstout@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The most wise advice ive read on this subject
> indicates that you should
> multiply each value by the same factor, 1.5 in this
> case. So
>
> 30 * 1.5
> 180 * 1.5
> 180*1.5
> 240* 1.5
>
> However, despite this reasoning, i agree that your
> solution is valid.
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Sami <sy1977@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Sami <sy1977@gmail.com>
> To: "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: RIP timers
> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 15:41:35 +0200
> Hello
>
> Just wondering if lab says rip update should be
> send every 45
> second.. is it
> ok to config timer like this ?
>
> rip > timer basic 45 180 180 240
>
> Doc CD says invalid and holdown timer should be 3
> times of update
> time and
> flush should be more than invaild timer.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:31 ART