From: Bajo (bajoalex@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 10:47:48 ART
Hi Larry, this may not be in your case. Just want to add to your comments :)
But re-checking even the basic stuff when done may be very important if you
have time left. The last section of the exam (such as reflexive
ACL....etc). may break even the core stuff. Also, not all questions are
independent ! If section X says "make sure route Y show up here" and
section B says summarize Y to blabla, you can see one can miss both sections
if section A was wrong. They actually check routes via "show ip route" :)
Never give up Chicago!!!
On 6/3/06, Larry Chuon <lchuon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi PR,
>
> You're not alone in this route. I just flunked my second attempt. The
> first time was the hardest. It took me a year to get my body and soul
> back
> together again. This time, I didn't feel that bad because I know the
> material well. My biggest problem is not working the lab in a structural
> way.
>
> I find suggestion from those who recently passed helpful, but they don't
> work for me. I need to develop my own methodology on how to study, do the
> lab and document my progress. Finally, I need to know when to give up on a
> problem, move on and return later. On my second attempt, there were two
> sections that I know them well. Ironically, I scored nill on both. One
> of
> them, I didn't even see the questions. Perhaps, I skipped the question
> some
> how. The second iron part is that I finished the lab more than an hour
> early to review and even verify my result. I just don't understand how I
> could have missed some questions completely. During the real lab, there
> are
> two possible outcomes for questions. Either you know it or you don't. If
> it is the former and you don't remember the required configuration task,
> use
> univercd. It's your friend. If it is the latter and you try to use the
> univercd, you won't have enough time to search. You can still use it once
> you completed all other sections first.
>
> Eventhough I failed, I am still satisfied with my progress. I would say
> that I performed 100% better than my first attempt. That is enough to
> keep
> me going back... because I know that "it can be done", like the proctor
> told
> me when I asked him somethng. ;)
>
> Larry
>
> On 5/30/06, ChicagoCCIE <chicagoccie@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I suggest you and all the members of this group to take a look at these
> > two links. After reading, All of you should be fine.
> >
> >
> >
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/022006-widernet-ccie.html?fsrc=rss-rout
> ers
> > http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/022006-widernet-ccie-side1.html
> >
> > Prakash Sosle R <psosle@gmail.com> wrote: Hi All,
> >
> > I have been a passive member of this list since couple of
> months.
> > I
> > took the lab a third time recently and did not get through. Based on
> the
> > report I was almost there. At this point I am very disillusioned. After
> > putting in so many hours of study .. not getting through is very
> > demoralising. Any advise from the group on how to go ahead after
> multiple
> > failures ?
> >
> > Any advise in much appreciated .
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > PR
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
> > rates starting at 1"/min.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Kind Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:31 ART