Re: tough redistribution ques

From: Sidalo (sidalo@gmail.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 11:09:06 ART


Not sure if you have access to Internetwork Expert WB v3, but if so check
the redistribution on Volume 1 Lab 6.

In short, the redistribution is not transitive on the same router. If A
goes into B and B goes into C, A does not automatically go into C, but must
be manually sent into C as well.

Is this a lab scenario somewhere? Does it actually have the restriction of
not redistributing that connected route into RIP?

On 5/24/06, Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>
> Lim -
>
> You probably want to remove the redistribute ospf under the ospf
> process. You should also add a statement " route-map map1 permit 20 "
> on R2. When you redistribute a protocol into another, it assumes
> redistribute connected. However, you are breaking the redistribution
> with the redistribution of the already connected interfaces and only
> redistributing the loopback 0 interface. Please let me know if I missed
> something.
>
>
> Dave Schulz,
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> lim es
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:26 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: tough redistribution ques
>
> Hi Group,
>
> [r1]---------[r2]---------[r3]
>
>
> r1 and r2 run rip, network: 12.0.0.0/24
>
> r2 and r3 run ospf, network: 23.0.0.0/24
>
> ===router configs ===
>
> r1:
>
> router rip
> no auto
> ver 2
> network 12.0.0.0
>
> r2:
>
> int lo0
> ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf network point-to-point
>
> router rip
> no auto
> ver 2
> network 12.0.0.0
> redistribute ospf 1 subnets
> default-metric 2
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 23.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> redistribute connected route-map map1
> redistribute ospf match internal ext 1 ext 2
> default-metric 10000
> !
> route-map map1 permit 10
> match int loopback0
> !
>
> r3:
> !
> router ospf 1
> network 23.0.0.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
>
> ==========
>
> Ques: How to get r1 to recieve that route for
> loopback0 without:
>
> 1) doing redistribute connected on rip
> 2) with static route
> 3) typical restrictions we have on the lab
>
>
> I am just puzzled with this
>
>
> TIA
>
>
> Lim
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART