RE: tough redistribution ques

From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 10:37:37 ART


Lim -

You probably want to remove the redistribute ospf under the ospf
process. You should also add a statement " route-map map1 permit 20 "
on R2. When you redistribute a protocol into another, it assumes
redistribute connected. However, you are breaking the redistribution
with the redistribution of the already connected interfaces and only
redistributing the loopback 0 interface. Please let me know if I missed
something.

Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
lim es
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:26 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: tough redistribution ques

Hi Group,

[r1]---------[r2]---------[r3]

r1 and r2 run rip, network: 12.0.0.0/24

r2 and r3 run ospf, network: 23.0.0.0/24

===router configs ===

r1:

router rip
no auto
ver 2
network 12.0.0.0

r2:

int lo0
ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
ip ospf network point-to-point

router rip
no auto
ver 2
network 12.0.0.0
redistribute ospf 1 subnets
default-metric 2
!
router ospf 1
network 23.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
redistribute connected route-map map1
redistribute ospf match internal ext 1 ext 2
default-metric 10000
!
route-map map1 permit 10
match int loopback0
!

r3:
!
router ospf 1
network 23.0.0.3 0.0.0.0 area 0

==========

Ques: How to get r1 to recieve that route for
loopback0 without:

1) doing redistribute connected on rip
2) with static route
3) typical restrictions we have on the lab

I am just puzzled with this

TIA

Lim



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART