From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon May 15 2006 - 18:06:12 ART
> I tried to do this with backdoor command but i got rib failure in my
BGP
> table
Why is RIB failure a bad thing? Do you know exactly what RIB failure
means?
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> juganmagan
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:01 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP problem
>
> R1-----------R2
> - -
> - -
> - -
> - -
> - -
> R3 -R4
>
> Hi Guys i have the above technlogy. R1,R3 & R4 are configured as
> confideration and R2 is in AS650.
> R2 has one ethernet interface configure with IP x.x.10.1 and this
network
> is advertied by OSpf to the
> whole routing domain.
> Now its asking for -
> Network x.x.10.0 should be advertised under bgp by netowrk command and
it
> should be seen in R1's BGP TABLE
> BUT must not seen in global routing table. We dont have to use
Distance
> command to accomplish this.
>
> I tried to do this with backdoor command but i got rib failure in my
BGP
> table
>
>
> Thanks
>
> "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> Also, you can do the ip ospf mtu-ignore on the switch interface or
SVI
> involved in the routing process.
>
>
> Dave Schulz
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Brian Dennis
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:58 AM
> To: juganmagan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: MTU Problem
>
> Another option is to alter the system MTU on the 3550. Remember to
> reload after making the change.
>
> Rack1SW2(config)#do sho system mtu
> System MTU size is 1500 bytes
> Rack1SW2(config)#system mtu 1504
> Changes to the System MTU will not take effect until the next reload
is
> done.
> Rack1SW2(config)#do sho system mtu
> System MTU size is 1500 bytes
> On next reload, system MTU will be 1504 bytes
> Rack1SW2(config)#
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
> bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> juganmagan
> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:45 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: MTU Problem
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I came across the adjancy problem in between one router and one 3550
> switch and this adjancy problem was due to MTU mismatch problem.
>
> On switch end MTU size was configured for 1540 and router end it was
> 1500. We can't change the interface MTU size to more then 1500.
>
> I configured
> #ip ospf mtu-ignore
>
> Was it right way for the lab point of view or there is any other
> method availble to change the MTU size.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low
> rates.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART