Re: Matching VOIP packets in a class map

From: Bobby (aggiebob98@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 11:46:56 ART

• Next message: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix port mapping"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIEin2006: "Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The first number is the initial port, the second is the range starting from that initial port. Now, the 3rd number is one that confuses me if anyone has light to shed??

CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote: Hello group,

I am confused about the proper way to match on voice packets in a class map.

According to Odom's QOS book, he often uses the following commands:

class-map match-all voip-rtp
match ip rtp 16384 16383

Is he specifically matching only 16384 and 16383 or is he matching a range?
Why does he place 16383 before 16384?

Thanks

• Next message: Guyler, Rik: "RE: pix port mapping"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Maybe in reply to: CCIEin2006: "Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Matching VOIP packets in a class map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART