From: Petr Lapukhov (petrsoft@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 11:58:23 ART
That was the "old" (12.1(2)T) way of matching RTP packets :)
it has syntax looking similar to "ip rtp priority" command, that is,
you first specify lower port and then "range" - number of contiguos
ports to match after lower port.
Now, with NBAR you also have option of "match protocol rtp" :)
2006/5/12, CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com>:
>
> Sorry, I meant why does he place 16384 before 16383?
> Normally when creating a range you place the lower number first don't you?
>
>
> On 5/12/06, CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello group,
> >
> > I am confused about the proper way to match on voice packets in a class
> > map.
> >
> > According to Odom's QOS book, he often uses the following commands:
> >
> > class-map match-all voip-rtp
> > match ip rtp 16384 16383
> >
> > Is he specifically matching only 16384 and 16383 or is he matching a
> > range?
> > Why does he place 16383 before 16384?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART