From: Sidalo (sidalo@gmail.com)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 03:59:51 ART
The first thing I see is this:
router eigrp 5
redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500 (redis 5 into 5)
Is that a typo on your post or is that a typo in your config that is your
issue?
Also I do not see a network statement on R1 for the loppback0 in eigrp 5
configuration.
R2 would be able to piing R1 e1 even if no routing protocols were going as
it is directly connected.
On 5/9/06, george stanza <cert2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> team,
>
> I am dead-struck on a simple redistribution problem and i am not sure what
> is happening. The topology is as follows::
> lo0 lo0 lo0
> 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3
> R4 <------->R1 <---------> R2 <-------> R3
> e0 e1 e0 e1 e0
>
> There is EIGRP 5 between R4 & R1 and there is EIGRP 6 between R1 & R2..
> R1 has loopback 0 as 1.1.1.1 and R2 as 2.2.2.2 and so on..
> Also, R1's Loop0 is in EIGRP 5 and R1's Loop1 (which is 100.100.1.1) is in
> EIGRP 6
> From R2, i am able to ping e1 of R1 but not the loopback or E0 of R1. The
> configuration is as follows (for R1)..any idea what i am missing here ?.
>
> R1:
> ===
> router eigrp 5
> redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
> network 21.21.1.2 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 1.1.1.1
> !
> router eigrp 6
> timers active-time 10
> redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
> network 100.100.1.1 0.0.0.0
> network 21.21.10.5 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 100.100.1.1
> !
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART