From: xprtofnet (xprtofnet@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue May 09 2006 - 19:03:48 ART
i would say that putting the path R-A in Area 1 and
path R-B in Area 2 should do it.
This would make R an ABR, hence requiring Area 0
connection. Do VL to A and another to B from R
A,B,C would share Area 0 on ethernet.
put L10 in A1, L20 in A2. this will make them
IntraArea routes and will be preferred. (after VL is
established)
should work...let me know,
m2c
--- Tag Spivey <tagspivey@gmail.com> wrote:
> L10 L20
> |---------s0[rtr R]s1----------|
> | |
> | |
> s0[rtr A]e0--|---e0[rtr B]s0
> |
> |
> e0
> [rtr C]
> L30 L40
>
> Hello all,
> I know this is elementery ospf stuff but Im drawing
> a blank for some reason.
> Im struggling with the proper way to handle this
> scenario.
>
> Router R has loopbacks 10 (10.10.10.1/24) and 20
> (20.20.20.1/24)
>
> Router R has equal links to A and B.
>
> Routers A and B exist on a common lan with router C
>
> Router C has loopbacks 30 (30.30.30.1/24) and 40
> (40.40.40.1/24)
>
>
> When net 30 wants to talk to net 10 I always want it
> to take the path
> through A and viceversa when 10 wants to talk to 30
>
> By the same token when 40 wants 20 or 20 wants 40 I
> always want to
> take the path through B
>
> no statics of course ;)
>
> Ive tried multi areas with distribution lists and
> route filters etc
> but im having trouble getting it to work and still
> have the links R-A
> and R-B pass all traffic should one or the other
> fail.
>
> If anyone could throw me a bone Id sure appreciate
> it!!!!!!
>
> Best Regards,
> Tag
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART