From: James Ventre (messageboard@ventrefamily.com)
Date: Tue May 09 2006 - 10:02:39 ART
>Could be due to more bandwidth.
You get the same bandwidth with equal cost routes as you do with
etherchannel.
Was this from a mock lab (or workbook) or is this a real life thing?
James
mani poopal wrote:
The requirement is to use the etherchannel. Could be due to more
bandwidth. Mani
James Ventre <messageboard@ventrefamily.com> wrote:
I may have missed the earlier part of this thread - but why not
do 2
separate routed links and let OSPF load balance across them? It
seems
to be much simpler and eliminates etherchannel (fewer things to
break).
James
mani poopal wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> A quick question
> First 3550(int vlan 5=10.10.10.1, lo0=11.11.11.11) is connected
to another 3550(interface vlan 5=10.10.10.2,
lo0=12.12.12.12)(Etherchannel). Both swithces are bundled togeter
through Etherchannel. If we run ospf on both swithces, there
should be ospf neighbor relationship between both switches. Now
the question is what is the difference/advamtage between L2
etherchannel vs L3 etherchannel. I don't have 2 3550's to test
the configuration.
>
> First 3550:
> router ospf 1
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 a 0
> network 11.11.11.11 0.0.0.0 a 0
>
> Second 3550:
> router ospf 1
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 a 0
> network 12.12.12.12 0.0.0.0 a 0
>
> thanks
>
> Mani
>
>
> B.ENG,MCSE,CCNP,CCSP,CCIE#14645
> (416)431 9929
> MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
B.ENG,MCSE,CCNP,CCSP,CCIE#14645
(416)431 9929
MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
--------------------------------------------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low
PC-to-Phone call rates.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART