From: Plank, Jason (JPlank@concordefs.com)
Date: Sun Apr 30 2006 - 13:17:02 GMT-3
I'm thinking he just botched that since he said it works when he doesn't use
the frame-map's. Didn't catch that the first time though... whoops.
-------------------
Jason Plank
Network Engineer
101 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com <mailto:JPlank@concordefs.com>
Phone: 302-793-5913
_____
From: Sidalo [mailto:sidalo@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 11:55 AM
To: Shamin
Cc: Plank, Jason; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: EIGRP over FR problem
You network statement on Rack1R3 does not match the interface:
You have:
Rack1R3#
int s0/0
ip address 162.1.13.3 <http://162.1.13.3> 255.255.255.0
<http://255.255.255.0>
router eigrp 200
network 162.1.13.1 <http://162.1.13.1> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0>
Either you typoed it here, or i am suprised it was working either way.
However assuming it was a typo, then when inverse-arp maps the address, if
you check your show frame-relay map command you will see that the dynamic
resolution carries the broadcast word on the map as well.
Jason is right however as well. Add the broadcast keyword on your map
statements. And I checked the IEWB solution set and yes the broadcast
keyword are there.
basically unless you are told not to use the broadcast keyword for some
reason, use it.
Some IEWB scenarios will say something like..:dont let any extra broadcasts
travel for r1 to r3".. and then of course leave it off.
On 4/30/06, Shamin <ccie.xpert@gmail.com <mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com> >
wrote:
I understand what you have mentioned about the broadcast.
I will try that as soon as i reach home. In the IEWB solution guide, i think
this wasnt mentioned. But its worth a try!.
But any idea why this was working perfectly with the Inverse-arp enabled and
no static mapping?
thanks
shamin
On 4/30/06, Plank, Jason <JPlank@concordefs.com
<mailto:JPlank@concordefs.com> > wrote:
>
> You need to add "broadcast" to the end of your FR map statements.
>
> -------------------
> Jason Plank
> Network Engineer
> 101 Bellevue Parkway
> Wilmington, DE 19809
> E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com <mailto:JPlank@concordefs.com>
> Phone: 302-793-5913
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com <mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com>
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com <mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> ] On Behalf Of
> Shamin
> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 10:44 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: EIGRP over FR problem
>
> Hi,
>
> <----- R3 ----- FR----- R1 ----->
>
> In the above setup, I am running EIGRP over the frame-relay. The issue I
> am
> facing is as follows:
>
> When i configure FR on R1 & R3 , for Inverse-arp , the EIGRP forms
> adjacency
> between R1 and R3 without any problems.
> But as per the lab requirements, the FR should be configured with static
> mapping using the Frame-relay map statement, the EIGRP does
> not form adjacency if I restart the adjacency formation. A vague
> configuration is as below.
>
> Rack1R1#
>
> int s0/0
> ip address 162.1.13.1 <http://162.1.13.1> 255.255.255.0
<http://255.255.255.0>
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 162.1.13.3 <http://162.1.13.3> 113
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>
> router eigrp 200
> eigrp router-id 150.1.1.1 <http://150.1.1.1>
> network 162.1.13.1 <http://162.1.13.1> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0>
> network 150.1.1.1 <http://150.1.1.1> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0>
> **************X*************X****************
> Rack1R3#
> int s0/0
> ip address 162.1.13.3 <http://162.1.13.3> 255.255.255.0
<http://255.255.255.0>
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 162.1.13.1 <http://162.1.13.1> 311
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>
> router eigrp 200
> eigrp router-id 150.1.3.3 <http://150.1.3.3>
> network 162.1.13.1 <http://162.1.13.1> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0>
>
>
>
******************X************************************X********************
> *
> ************
>
>
> With the above setup,I dont find the any neighbors in my " sh ip eigrp
> neighbors" command. But i am able to ping the IP of the opposite routers
> FR
> interface. But I will not be able to ping R1's Loopback interface from R3
> with the above setup.
> If i change this setup to Inverse-arp and issue the " clear frame-relay
> inarp" , I see neighbors in eigrp as soon as the FR network comes up.
>
> I am doin the IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 TASK-FR . Any thing I am doin wrong here?
>
> regards
> shamin
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information in this message may be proprietary and/or
> confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify First Data
> immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
> computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3