RE: EIGRP over FR problem

From: Magmax (magmax@bigpond.net.au)
Date: Sun Apr 30 2006 - 15:11:11 GMT-3


SHAMIN,

Use neighbour command under eigrp process. I believe you are running
Frame-relay in NBMA

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shamin
Sent: Monday, 1 May 2006 12:44 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: EIGRP over FR problem

Hi,

<----- R3 ----- FR----- R1 ----->

In the above setup, I am running EIGRP over the frame-relay. The issue I am
facing is as follows:

When i configure FR on R1 & R3 , for Inverse-arp , the EIGRP forms adjacency
between R1 and R3 without any problems.
But as per the lab requirements, the FR should be configured with static
mapping using the Frame-relay map statement, the EIGRP does
not form adjacency if I restart the adjacency formation. A vague
configuration is as below.

Rack1R1#

int s0/0
 ip address 162.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay map ip 162.1.13.3 113
 no frame-relay inverse-arp

router eigrp 200
 eigrp router-id 150.1.1.1
 network 162.1.13.1 0.0.0.0
 network 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
                 **************X*************X****************
Rack1R3#
    int s0/0
      ip address 162.1.13.3 255.255.255.0
      encapsulation frame-relay
      frame-relay map ip 162.1.13.1 311
      no frame-relay inverse-arp

     router eigrp 200
       eigrp router-id 150.1.3.3
       network 162.1.13.1 0.0.0.0

******************X************************************X********************
*
************

With the above setup,I dont find the any neighbors in my " sh ip eigrp
neighbors" command. But i am able to ping the IP of the opposite routers FR
interface. But I will not be able to ping R1's Loopback interface from R3
with the above setup.
If i change this setup to Inverse-arp and issue the " clear frame-relay
inarp" , I see neighbors in eigrp as soon as the FR network comes up.

I am doin the IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 TASK-FR . Any thing I am doin wrong here?

regards
shamin



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3