Re: Progress?

From: Ben (ccieben@cox.net)
Date: Thu Apr 27 2006 - 12:17:49 GMT-3


I agree with Alexei - it works (mostly) fine in 12.2T on a 2600 - except
I've had problems when I try to configure it with a native vlan
(problems I couldn't replicate when using a 7206's FastEthernet interfaces).

Ben

darby.weaver@universalorlando.com wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> I had not noticed many people posting about using 10mb Ethernet Subinterfaces?
>
> Has no one encountered during their studies?
>
> example:
>
> int e0.1
> ip addr 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
>
> int e0.2
> ip addr 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.252
>
> etc.
>
> Seems like if it were encountered and one was not aware of it - it could trip someone up as simple of a concept that it might seem.
>
> I have not yet encountered it in any of my lab workbooks or in the classes I just came back from this year...
>
> An odd one, and rather simple if you know of it already and not terribly hard to figure out if you had to...
>
> Unless of course you just ruled it out entirely and simply dismissed it.
>
> A friend of mine asked me this one once and I had to go back to a rack to verify it was even possible, as I wanter to think of other options upon first hearing of the concept.
>
> Just curious if anyone else had seen it yet.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3