Re: How to override the BGP Decision Process if possible?

From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 00:36:45 GMT-3


 Yeap Thank you so much

Rack1R2#show ip bgp
88.88.88.0
BGP routing table entry for 88.88.88.0/24, version
219
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table
Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag:
0x820
Advertised to
update-groups:
1
300
164.1.12.1 from 164.1.12.1
(10.1.1.1)
Origin IGP, metric 200, localpref 100, valid, external,
best

Rack1R1#show run | b bgp
router bgp 300
 no synchronization
 bgp router-id 10.1.1.1
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 164.1.13.0 mask 255.255.255.0 route-map SETCOM
 neighbor 164.1.12.2 remote-as 200
 neighbor 164.1.12.2 route-map TOR2-SETMED out
 neighbor 164.1.13.3 remote-as 200
 neighbor 164.1.13.3 route-map TOR3-SETMED out
 neighbor 164.1.13.3 advertise-map EXISTE non-exist-map NOEXOSTE
 neighbor 164.1.18.8 remote-as 300
 neighbor 164.1.18.8 default-originate
 neighbor 164.1.18.8 route-map FILTRO out
 no auto-summary

Rack1R1#show route
route-map SETCOM, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
Set clauses:
community no-advertise
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map FILTRO, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address prefix-lists: FILTRO
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map NOEXOSTE, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address prefix-lists: 88
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map EXISTE, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address prefix-lists: EXISTE?
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map TOR2-SETMED, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address prefix-lists: 88
Set clauses:
metric 200
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map TOR2-SETMED, permit, sequence 1000
Match clauses:
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map TOR3-SETMED, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address prefix-lists: 88
Set clauses:
metric 100
as-path prepend 300 301
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map TOR3-SETMED, permit, sequence 1000
Match clauses:
Set clauses:
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Brian McGahan escribis:

          You can use BGP conditional advertisement on R1 to accomplish
  this.
  
  HTH,
  
  Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
  
  Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
  Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
  24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

    -----Original Message-----
    From: nobody@groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On Behalf

  Of

    Victor Cappuccio
    Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 6:11 PM
    To: CCIE LAB
    Subject: How to override the BGP Decision Process if possible?
    
    Hello All
    
    R1 in an AS 300 that is a dual homed system, lets say
    
    Router 1 in Remote-as 300
    Router 1 neighbor R2 in remote-as 200
    Router 1 neighbor R3 in remote-as 200
    
    Now the link between R1 and R3 is very slow, but the administrator of

  AS

    200 had set a Local Pref to 400 in R3 and 200 in R2.. Just for

  example. -

    Not real world situation. - but it could happen ;)
    
    Is there any way I could override this situation??
    
    Rack1R2#show ip bgp 88.88.88.0
    BGP routing table entry for 88.88.88.0/24, version 43
    Paths: (2 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
    Flag: 0x820
    Advertised to update-groups:
    1
    300 300 301, (Received from a RR-client)
    164.1.23.3 from 164.1.23.3 (10.3.3.3)
    Origin IGP, metric 100, localpref 400, valid, internal, best
    300
    164.1.12.1 from 164.1.12.1 (10.1.1.1)
    Origin IGP, metric 200, localpref 100, valid, external
    
    Ok the BGP decision process goes like this Next Hop Reachable? ->

  Weight

    -> Local Pref -> AS-PATH -> MED -> External (EBGP) is better than
    confederation external, which is better than IBGP
    
    But … lets look it this way, I’m the customer of As 200

  and

    the administrators are very busy. is there any way to deal with this
    issue ? (beside shutting down my neighbor relation to R3) Also for

  other

    good reasons the internal network of AS 200 (which I do not concern)

  is

    using more Links to get to my AS 300
    
    Thanks
    Victor.-

  _______________________________________________________________________

    Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3