From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:42:52 GMT-3
Thanks Brian, jejeje The translation into Spanish makes sometimes
learning slow..
But 1 Step at the time ...
Brian McGahan escribis:
"O" is Intra-Area and "O IA" is Inter-Area. An Inter-Area route
is a Summary LSA, while a Summary Route can be either a Summary LSA or
an External LSA... go figure :)
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On Behalf
Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:05 PM
To: CCIE LAB
Subject: OSPF Jargon..
Hello All,
Here is a Silly question (& its not a joke) I have, Ok The books and
the things I hear is that an IO Ospf Route is an intra area route and
the routes with a O in the OSPF jargon is an Inter area route..
Why not calling them OSPF Summary Route? Instead of the both 2 above
that sounds the same when you hear them?? And maybe the real summary,
just aggregate (or its because the real Summary Route Type 5 E(1|2)
or
Type 7 N(1|2) can come from 2 sources??)
Thanks
Confused
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3