From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Fri Apr 14 2006 - 18:52:20 GMT-3
At 4:05 PM -0400 4/14/06, Victor Cappuccio wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>Here is a Silly question (& its not a joke) I have, Ok The books
>and the things I hear is that an IO Ospf Route is an intra area
>route and the routes with a O in the OSPF jargon is an Inter area
>route..
>
>Why not calling them OSPF Summary Route? Instead of the both 2 above
>that sounds the same when you hear them?? And maybe the real
>summary, just aggregate (or its because the real Summary Route Type
>5 E(1|2) or Type 7 N(1|2) can come from 2 sources??)
>
>Thanks
>Confused
Well, it's always best to go back to the RFC for definitive language
and then see what Cisco calls it. Inter-area and external routes,
however, need not summarize anything: they can be as specific as a
host route.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3