From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Apr 14 2006 - 17:25:36 GMT-3
"O" is Intra-Area and "O IA" is Inter-Area. An Inter-Area route
is a Summary LSA, while a Summary Route can be either a Summary LSA or
an External LSA... go figure :)
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Victor Cappuccio
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: CCIE LAB
> Subject: OSPF Jargon..
>
> Hello All,
>
> Here is a Silly question (& its not a joke) I have, Ok The books and
> the things I hear is that an IO Ospf Route is an intra area route and
> the routes with a O in the OSPF jargon is an Inter area route..
>
> Why not calling them OSPF Summary Route? Instead of the both 2 above
> that sounds the same when you hear them?? And maybe the real summary,
> just aggregate (or its because the real Summary Route Type 5 E(1|2)
or
> Type 7 N(1|2) can come from 2 sources??)
>
> Thanks
> Confused
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3