From: Plank, Jason (JPlank@concordefs.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 12:06:19 GMT-3
I completely agree. You will find most of the same information on cisco's
website as well. It is also touched on in Routing/TCP-IP vol 1.
-------------------
Jason Plank
Network Engineer
101 Bellevue Parkway
Wilmington, DE 19809
E-mail: JPlank@concordefs.com
Phone: 302-793-5913
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ZeroFlash
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:55 AM
To: 'xprtofnet'; 'Radioactive Frog'; 'ZeroFlash'
Cc: 'ccielab'
Subject: RE: Difference between ip route 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
While this is all fine going out the broadcast media (though personally I
would never use the interface option), troubleshooting the command using the
interface option is much harder than using the addresses due to someone
stating earlier that it can create loops in the network, proxy-arp issues,
timeouts, testing and ensuring fail-over, blah, blahh...
Thanks
ZeroFlash
-----Original Message-----
From: xprtofnet [mailto:xprtofnet@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:46 AM
To: Radioactive Frog; ZeroFlash
Cc: xprtofnet; ccielab
Subject: Re: Difference between ip route 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
with broadcast media use interface. advtge is that if
you specify next hop you are going more static than
dynamic-if that nxt-hp goes away and there are other
routers that can take your pkt why not use them.
e.g.
____R2...
r1---\
\---R3...
if r1 goes to any 1 router as next hop then what if
that router goes down ?
if r1 goes to its outgoing interface it can reach
either r2 or r3. (keep arp-timeout in consideration on
r1-- if you keep it small it will quickly fall to
other router)
now, if you are using hsrp between r2/r3 then you
should point to the hsrp address on r1.
m2c
--- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> As ZeroFlash has explained the application is there
> any advantage of using
> one or other ?
>
> Frog!!
>
>
> On 4/10/06, ZeroFlash <Fire_Ice@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > Also, take a look at the admin distances between
> using the interface vs.
> > an
> > address.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ZeroFlash
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > xprtofnet
> > Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:02 AM
> > To: Radioactive Frog; ccielab
> > Subject: Re: Difference between ip route
> 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
> > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> >
> > with frame/atm use the next-hop addrs while with
> > ethernet/broadcast media you can use the
> interface.
> >
> > if you use the interface with nbma media it will
> not
> > know which dlci/vc to put the packet on thats why
> you
> > should use the next-addrs
> >
> > m2c
> >
> > --- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Group,
> > >
> > > What is the difference between
> > >
> > > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 Vs. ip route
> > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> > >
> > >
> > > Both does the same job. Just wondering if
> anybody
> > > can quickly explain the
> > > application or scenario for both commands.
> > >
> > > means Serial 0/0 Vs next hop id (192.168.1.2) ??
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > FROG
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3