From: xprtofnet (xprtofnet@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 11:59:50 GMT-3
loops only if you have a physical loop =^)
m2c
--- ZeroFlash <Fire_Ice@verizon.net> wrote:
> While this is all fine going out the broadcast media
> (though personally I
> would never use the interface option),
> troubleshooting the command using the
> interface option is much harder than using the
> addresses due to someone
> stating earlier that it can create loops in the
> network, proxy-arp issues,
> timeouts, testing and ensuring fail-over, blah,
> blahh...
>
> Thanks
>
> ZeroFlash
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xprtofnet [mailto:xprtofnet@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:46 AM
> To: Radioactive Frog; ZeroFlash
> Cc: xprtofnet; ccielab
> Subject: Re: Difference between ip route
> 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>
> with broadcast media use interface. advtge is that
> if
> you specify next hop you are going more static than
> dynamic-if that nxt-hp goes away and there are other
> routers that can take your pkt why not use them.
>
> e.g.
> ____R2...
> r1---\
> \---R3...
>
> if r1 goes to any 1 router as next hop then what if
> that router goes down ?
>
> if r1 goes to its outgoing interface it can reach
> either r2 or r3. (keep arp-timeout in consideration
> on
> r1-- if you keep it small it will quickly fall to
> other router)
>
> now, if you are using hsrp between r2/r3 then you
> should point to the hsrp address on r1.
>
> m2c
>
> --- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As ZeroFlash has explained the application is
> there
> > any advantage of using
> > one or other ?
> >
> > Frog!!
> >
> >
> > On 4/10/06, ZeroFlash <Fire_Ice@verizon.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, take a look at the admin distances between
> > using the interface vs.
> > > an
> > > address.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > ZeroFlash
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > xprtofnet
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:02 AM
> > > To: Radioactive Frog; ccielab
> > > Subject: Re: Difference between ip route
> > 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
> > > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> > >
> > > with frame/atm use the next-hop addrs while with
> > > ethernet/broadcast media you can use the
> > interface.
> > >
> > > if you use the interface with nbma media it will
> > not
> > > know which dlci/vc to put the packet on thats
> why
> > you
> > > should use the next-addrs
> > >
> > > m2c
> > >
> > > --- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Group,
> > > >
> > > > What is the difference between
> > > >
> > > > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 Vs. ip
> route
> > > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Both does the same job. Just wondering if
> > anybody
> > > > can quickly explain the
> > > > application or scenario for both commands.
> > > >
> > > > means Serial 0/0 Vs next hop id (192.168.1.2)
> ??
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > FROG
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3