From: PANDI MOORTHY (moorthypandi@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 10:18:28 GMT-3
Thank you
On 4/9/06, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> ip rtp priority
>
> is better way
>
> A.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "PANDI MOORTHY" <moorthypandi@gmail.com>
> To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:50 AM
> Subject: Class map for VOIP traffic
>
>
> > The question is to put the VOIP traffic into the "priority queuing" (The
> > current problem is poor voice quality)
> >
> >
> >
> > My confusion is in matching the VOIP packet.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can I just match the UDP packet " 16384 32767" , will it sufficient.
> >
> >
> >
> > ip access-list extended
> >
> > permit udp any any range 16384 32767
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Do I need match the TCP 1720 also?
> >
> >
> >
> > ip access-list extended VoIP
> >
> > permit tcp any any eq 1720
> >
> > permit udp any any range 16384 32767
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Because in Internetwork solution guide, for some scenario they just
> match
> > only UDP port and for some they match both of them.
> >
> >
> > Please advice me.
> >
> > Regards.
> > Pandi
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3