From: ZeroFlash (Fire_Ice@verizon.net)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2006 - 22:15:22 GMT-3
Do you have any other areas for OSPF Process 1?
I would like to see the other device that is running OSPF 1 for network
137.1.58.x.
So far I only see 1 area for OSPF Process 1 and if you have another area
configured (other than area 0) for that process on another device then
you'll need an area 0 for that process to operate.
ZeroFlash
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Griffin
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 5:25 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Is this Normal OSPF Behavior
If your running multiple ospf processes, should you get output from a
"sh ip route ospf" if you have routes in both processes, I'm not?
Rack1SW2#sh run | begin router
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute ospf 2 subnets
passive-interface default
no passive-interface FastEthernet0/5
network 137.1.58.8 0.0.0.0 area 58
!
router ospf 2
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute ospf 1 subnets
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Vlan28
network 137.1.28.8 0.0.0.0 area 0
Rack1SW2#sh ip route ospf
Rack1SW2#
Rack1SW2#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is not set
137.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O E2 137.1.12.0 [110/64] via 137.1.28.2, 00:03:07, Vlan28
O E2 137.1.15.0 [110/128] via 137.1.28.2, 00:03:07, Vlan28
O E2 137.1.25.0 [110/64] via 137.1.28.2, 00:03:07, Vlan28
C 137.1.28.0 is directly connected, Vlan28
C 137.1.58.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/5
150.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O E2 150.1.2.0 [110/1] via 137.1.28.2, 00:03:07, Vlan28
C 150.1.8.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3