Re: Redistribution prevention using Admin Distance

From: Venkatesh Palani (kvpalani@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2006 - 11:13:09 GMT-3


Thanks mate it realy helped

On 3/16/06, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hejsan.
>
> If you change a distance for one routing protocol to a value higher than
> another one has, running on the same router, routes with lower distance
> will be placed in RIB. Routes with higher distance will still be in OSPF
> database (as per your example). If router for some reason stops getting
> updates via another (preferable) routing protocol, it will pick OSPF
> routes. The router will still be participating in OSPF social life. :-)
>
> A.
>
> on 16/03/2006 13:23 Venkatesh Palani wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> > I am a bit confused abt using admin distance to prevent loops under
> mutual
> > redistribution. I have always used tags to perform this. so how does
> using
> > admin distance work for example if I use distance command under OSPF and
> > change the external OSPF to say 120 ? will these routes no more be
> > considered as an OSPF or what is the logic behind it. It will be great
> if
> > some one cld help me with some reference link or some scenario.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Venkatesh
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3