From: Tim (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:31:18 GMT-3
James,
Sorry, I should have been more clear.
Yes, it's a single chassis environment with dual MSFC's. Given this, what
are the pro's and con's of using HSRP versus SRM?
Does one method provide a highly level of fault tolerance than the other?
Why?
Thanks, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: James Ventre [mailto:messageboard@ventrefamily.com]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:14 AM
To: Tim
Cc: 'Group Study'
Subject: Re: SRM vs HSRP
Can you please clarify .... Is your comparison using DRM w/ HSRP to
using SRM without HSRP in a single chassis environment?
James
Tim wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> I just learned about a 6500 feature called Single Router Mode (SRM). With
> this feature enabled on a 6500 with dual MSFC's, if one MSFC goes down the
> other takes over.
>
>
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_7_3/confg_gd/
> redund.htm#wp1071742
>
>
>
> If I have a choice between using this feature versus using HSRP which
> feature provides between fault-tolerance?
>
>
>
> Can anyone speak to the pro's and con's of using SRM vs HSRP?
>
>
>
> TIA, Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3