SRM vs HSRP

From: Tim (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:10:32 GMT-3

• Next message: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Previous message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: QoS scenario --> bandwidth fall back Question"
• Next in thread: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Jeremy O'Dette: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Guys,

I just learned about a 6500 feature called Single Router Mode (SRM). With
this feature enabled on a 6500 with dual MSFC's, if one MSFC goes down the
other takes over.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_7_3/confg_gd/
redund.htm#wp1071742

If I have a choice between using this feature versus using HSRP which
feature provides between fault-tolerance?

Can anyone speak to the pro's and con's of using SRM vs HSRP?

TIA, Tim

• Next message: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Previous message: Bob Sinclair: "Re: QoS scenario --> bandwidth fall back Question"
• Next in thread: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: James Ventre: "Re: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Tim: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Maybe reply: Jeremy O'Dette: "RE: SRM vs HSRP"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3