Re: Re: ebgp-multihop command without ttl value

From: Venkatesh Palani (kvpalani@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 11 2006 - 23:01:38 GMT-3

• Next message: easyman.lin: "RE: IE Advanced Technology Labs --- Router-on-a-stick with"
• Previous message: Venkatesh Palani: "Re: order of operation"
• Maybe in reply to: PANDI MOORTHY: "Re: ebgp-multihop command without ttl value"
• Next in thread: Saad Adam: "Re: Re: ebgp-multihop command without ttl value"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

HI Ajay,
Could you please exaplain what does it mean by "eBGP neighborship can be
setup using a sub-optimal routing path" and what are its impacts ?, because
I always thought the TTL values is to do with secuirty ( correct me if I am
wrong).

Thank you,
Venkatesh

On 2/12/06, ajay@topguntechnologies.com <ajay@topguntechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The only issue with not specifying the ttl value(or prob. not restricting
> it to a particular value) is that the eBGP neighborship can be setup using
a
> sub-optimal routing path.
>
>
> HTH
>
> Ajay Pandey, CCIE # 14792
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: easyman.lin: "RE: IE Advanced Technology Labs --- Router-on-a-stick with"
• Previous message: Venkatesh Palani: "Re: order of operation"
• Maybe in reply to: PANDI MOORTHY: "Re: ebgp-multihop command without ttl value"
• Next in thread: Saad Adam: "Re: Re: ebgp-multihop command without ttl value"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3