From: Alex (alex.arseniev@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:57:45 GMT-3
Post Your configs and "sh ip bgp 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0" printout from R1, R2
and R3.
Cheers
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Pedley" <darren@dnsl.com>
To: "Alex" <alex.arseniev@gmail.com>
Cc: "Darren Pedley" <darren@dnsl.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Multihome BGP / Confed issue
> Sorry my routers are numbered a little differently from my post (for
> simplifing things).
>
> R3 sends the update to either r1 or r2 to withdraw the route.
>
> So it should read
>
> "BGP(0): 3.3.3.3 rcv UPDATE about 1.1.1.0/24 -- withdrawn"
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Darren
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:29:09PM -0000, Alex wrote:
>> >I have ebgp peering (within the confed) between r3 and e1<====r1,
>> >perhaps?
>>
>> >"BGP(0): 2.2.2.2 rcv UPDATE about 1.1.1.0/24 -- withdrawn"
>> >
>> >My understanding is r2 send a withdraw msg for some reason?
>>
>> Are you sure about this? According to Your original post r2 and r1 are
>> not
>> even BGP peers.
>> HTH
>> Cheers
>> Alex
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3