From: xprtofnet (xprtofnet@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Feb 01 2006 - 00:13:28 GMT-3
I believe the concern was regarding best practice when
you have multiple paths from BGP...and hence it makes
it a multihomed scenario...meaning you dont want your
own AS to be the transit so could be that you may want
to advertise your own prefixes only...
m2c
--- xprtofnet <xprtofnet@yahoo.com> wrote:
> perhaps..
>
> R2(config-router)#bgp ma
> R2(config-router)#bgp maxas-limit ?
> <1-2000> Number of ASes in the AS-PATH attribute
>
> This is # of ASes in a path and not paths from an
> AS.
>
> i guess ip paths can be achieve from
>
> R2(config-router)#maximum-paths ?
> <1-16> Number of paths
> ibgp iBGP-multipath
>
> R2(config-router)#maximum-paths
>
>
> M2c
>
> --- "Salzano, Mario Arthur Costa"
> <mario.salzano@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody knows what would be the best practice
> > to limit the number
> > of AS-PATHS received by the remote-as 254 to 10?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3