From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com
Date: Tue Jan 31 2006 - 16:23:38 GMT-3
The time interval was never stated.
"Exceeding Client Expectations"
"Salzano, Mario
Arthur Costa"
<mario.salzano@si To
emens.com> "Gary Ring"
<garyring.work@gmail.com>,
01/31/2006 02:16 <Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com>
PM cc
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject
RE: Confused on Burst Value
Hi,
Only one question: In the question bellow it is clearly said that the
burst is measured at a time interval of 200ms? If Yes it's ok, but if
not, in my opinion by default the burst is measured at a time interval
of 125ms. What do you think?
Best Regards.
Salzano
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Gary Ring
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:02 PM
To: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Confused on Burst Value
Bill,
I agree that it should not be 8000. The burst is measured at a time
interval
of 200ms. That said, 200ms=.2s, 1s/.2s = 5 time intervals in a second
and
8000 bytes x 5 = 40000bps. I would think the answer should be 12800.
Using
the prior calculations, 12800 bytes x 5 = 64000bps.
HTH,
Gary
On 1/31/06, Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com <Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com> wrote:
>
> Could someone please shed some light on this for me?
>
> IEWB-ver3 Lab 8, Section 7.3 Congestion Management
>
> Prioritizing Audio Traffic. This traffic should be allocated a maximum
of
> 128000bps of the output queue of R1 and R3.
> Ensure to allow for a burst value of 64000bps.
>
> Solution:
> (parts omitted)
>
> policy-map VOICE1
> class VOICE
> priority 128 8000 <----- Why is this value 8000?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Bill
> ============================================
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments
> to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and
> may
> contain confidential or privileged information. No representation is
made
> on its accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this
> electronic message. Certain assumptions may have been made in the
> preparation of this material as of this date, and are subject to
change
> without notice. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail
> and
> any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited.
>
> Please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of this message and
any
> attachments from your system.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:51 GMT-3