From: Jonathan Stevens (jonathanstevens.net@googlemail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 30 2006 - 05:22:17 GMT-3
yeah - ok ;)
Richard Dumoulin wrote:
> Ok, SLA is more meaningful even for technical people. Do you agree on
> that one?
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Jonathan Stevens [mailto:jonathanstevens.net@googlemail.com]
> Envoyi : dimanche 29 janvier 2006 21:27
> @ : Richard Dumoulin
> Cc : 'CCIEin2006'; ccie lab
> Objet : Re: RE : Any difference between SAA and IP SLA?
>
> Hrm... now why would you want a nontechnical person configuring your
> routers?
>
> Richard Dumoulin wrote:
>
> >Just the syntax is the different. The reason of the change is
> probably that
> >SLA is more meaningful to non technical persons
> >
> >-- Richard
> >
> >-----Message d'origine-----
> >De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] De la part de
> >CCIEin2006
> >Envoyi : dimanche 29 janvier 2006 01:34
> >@ : ccie lab
> >Objet : Any difference between SAA and IP SLA?
> >
> >Is there a difference between Service Assurance Agent and IP SLA?
> >The only difference I see is that SLA uses IP sla commands while SAA
> uses
> >RTR commands.
> >
> >Can someone explain the benefit of one over the other?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
> >**********************************************************************
> >Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
> >necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
> are
> >confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
> you are not
> >the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to
> the
> >intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in
> error and
> >that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly
> prohibited.
> >
> >If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned
> with the
> >content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
> >
> >The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> viruses
> >which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has
> taken every
> >reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept
> liability for
> >any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You
> should carry
> >out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> >**********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and
> not necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with
> it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient.
> If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
> delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
> copying or use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
> the content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the sender
> has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
> accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
> software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before
> opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3