From: Richard Dumoulin (Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr)
Date: Sun Jan 29 2006 - 17:37:59 GMT-3
Ok, SLA is more meaningful even for technical people. Do you agree on that
one?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jonathan Stevens [mailto:jonathanstevens.net@googlemail.com]
Envoyi : dimanche 29 janvier 2006 21:27
@ : Richard Dumoulin
Cc : 'CCIEin2006'; ccie lab
Objet : Re: RE : Any difference between SAA and IP SLA?
Hrm... now why would you want a nontechnical person configuring your
routers?
Richard Dumoulin wrote:
>Just the syntax is the different. The reason of the change is probably that
>SLA is more meaningful to non technical persons
>
>-- Richard
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] De la part de
>CCIEin2006
>Envoyi : dimanche 29 janvier 2006 01:34
>@ : ccie lab
>Objet : Any difference between SAA and IP SLA?
>
>Is there a difference between Service Assurance Agent and IP SLA?
>The only difference I see is that SLA uses IP sla commands while SAA uses
>RTR commands.
>
>Can someone explain the benefit of one over the other?
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
>necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
>confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are
not
>the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the
>intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error
and
>that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly
prohibited.
>
>If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
>content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
>The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
>which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken
every
>reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for
>any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should
carry
>out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
>**********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
**********************************************************************
Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken every
reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for
any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry
out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to this e-mail.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3