From: Leigh Nash (leigh@net-elite.org)
Date: Thu Jan 26 2006 - 21:43:56 GMT-3
I haven't checked the scenario, but if autorp is in the picture, it might be
indicative that "ip autorp listener" is needed. Watch out for RPF failures -
you might require static mroutes. If you don't need the mroute, then
consider it like the real lab where it might just be time waster that makes
you think.
Leigh
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
forwardtruth@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 3:38 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: sparse mode and sparse-dense mode
In IEWB-R&S V1 Lab 4 Task 7.2 and 7.6
7.2 Configure PIM sparse mode on the following interfaces.
7.6 Do not enable sparse-dense mode on any interface.
7.7 The use of multicast static routes is permitted.
1- If he has stated in 7.2 that we have to configure sparse, why does he
state that we should not enable sparse-dense mode ?
2- What is the benefit of mentioning 7.7,,,,though static route has not been
configure in the solution ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3