From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Jan 22 2006 - 11:39:20 GMT-3
No it is not mandatory to have a direct physical connection between the
RR and its clients.
Rack1R2#sho run | be router bgp 100
router bgp 100
neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0
!
Rack1R2#
Rack1AS>4
[Resuming connection 4 to r4 ... ]
Rack1R4#sho run | be router bgp 100
router bgp 100
neighbor 150.1.2.2 remote-as 100
neighbor 150.1.2.2 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 150.1.2.2 route-reflector-client
!
Rack1R4#
Rack1R4#trace 150.1.2.2 source lo 0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 150.1.2.2
1 164.1.0.3 28 msec 32 msec 32 msec
2 164.1.13.1 44 msec 44 msec 44 msec
3 164.1.12.2 44 msec * 44 msec
Rack1R4#
Rack1R4#sho ip bgp sum
BGP router identifier 150.1.4.4, local AS number 100
BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
150.1.2.2 4 100 5 5 1 0 0 00:01:08
0
Rack1R4#
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bonjat
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 6:11 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Connectivity between RR and client's
Hello friends,
Would appreciate if you can help me clear this doubt:
Between RR and the client's, is it mandatory to have a
"direct physical" connectivity?
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3