From: CCIEin2006 (ciscocciein2006@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 14:51:37 GMT-3
Really? I've never heard of connected interfaces being automatically being
redistributed?!? Do you mean directly connected interface that are
advertised via network statements in the routing protocol?
On 1/18/06, Edmundo Bodero <bodero.edmundo@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi group,
>
> When we redistribute one routing protocol into another in IPv4, the
> directly
> connected interfaces of the first protocol are automatically included in
> the
> redistribution (except for ISIS). I think this is called implicit
> redistribution rule. I have been playing with redistribution in IPv6
> (between OSPF and RIP both ways) and I think that this rule doesn't apply
> to
> IPv6. The only way to include the connected networks in the redistribution
> is to use the redistribute connected statement. Is that correct or Am I
> missing something?.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Edmundo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3