From: Edmundo Bodero (bodero.edmundo@googlemail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 18 2006 - 16:12:55 GMT-3
Thanks!!. The include connected option is easier. I guess the method to use
will depend on the question.
Regards,
Edmundo
Note: connected refers to interfaces running the routing protocol that are
directly connected to the redistribution router.
On 1/18/06, asadovnikov <asadovnikov@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> There is also 'include connected' option on the redistribute command which
> makes implicit connected redistribution working in a similar to IPv4
> fashion. You may need some reasonably new IOS to have this option though.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexei
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Edmundo Bodero
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:48 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPv6 redistribution
>
> Hi group,
>
> When we redistribute one routing protocol into another in IPv4, the
> directly
> connected interfaces of the first protocol are automatically included in
> the
> redistribution (except for ISIS). I think this is called implicit
> redistribution rule. I have been playing with redistribution in IPv6
> (between OSPF and RIP both ways) and I think that this rule doesn't apply
> to
> IPv6. The only way to include the connected networks in the redistribution
> is to use the redistribute connected statement. Is that correct or Am I
> missing something?.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Edmundo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3